Zambia- ZRA’s Smart Invoice Deadline: What It Means for Businesses and How to Adapt Chintan Prajapati December 18, 2024 3 min read Today, I had an intriguing conversation with a customer in Zambia. They brought up a pressing issue that many businesses in the region are grappling with: the mandate for integrating with the Zambia Revenue Authority’s (ZRA) Smart Invoice system. The ZRA has set a clear deadline — businesses exceeding a certain turnover threshold must comply. If their accounting systems don’t sync with the ZRA’s Smart Invoice system, they risk non-compliance, penalties, and disrupted operations.This got me thinking about the problem from multiple perspectives, and the layers of complexity unfolded like chapters in a book.Chapter 1: The Business Owner’s StruggleImagine being a business owner already juggling countless responsibilities. You now face the daunting task of ensuring your accounting system syncs seamlessly with the ZRA’s Smart Invoice system. You turn to an accounting service provider, assuming they can solve the problem, only to realize that neither party has the technical capability to create the necessary integration.The only option left? Manually replicate data between your order management or accounting system and Smart Invoice. This isn’t just inefficient — it’s soul-draining. Now multiply this struggle by 10,000 businesses facing the same challenge. The cumulative waste of time and energy is staggering.Chapter 2: ZRA’s AmbitionFrom the ZRA’s perspective, this mandate is a progressive step. Modernizing tax systems and implementing robust controls are vital for the nation’s growth. The Smart Invoice initiative reflects their vision for better tax compliance and streamlined governance. While the intention is noble, the ripple effects of such mandates on businesses and the broader ecosystem can’t be ignored.Chapter 3: The Accounting SaaS DilemmaThis brought me to another layer of the problem: accounting software providers like Xero, Sage, and MYOB. For a tech company serving Africa — a continent with 54 countries — staying updated with the ever-changing policies of multiple governments is a monumental task.If similar systems are rolled out in other African nations, how would accounting SaaS providers cope? Building integrations with government systems requires dedicated teams, deep technical expertise, and significant resources. Falling short means risking customer attrition, while keeping up is a logistical and financial nightmare.It reminded me of Uganda’s EFRIS system, a similar mandate that created significant challenges for businesses there. History seems to be repeating itself.Chapter 4: The Bookkeeper’s OpportunityThen there’s the perspective of bookkeeping firms. For them, this mandate presents a double-edged sword. On one hand, it’s an opportunity to charge clients for additional hours spent managing this compliance. On the other, the inefficiencies and manual interventions required could strain relationships with clients in the long run.Chapter 5: The System Integrator’s RoleLastly, I reflected on system integrator companies. These are the players with the technical expertise to develop integrations with ZRA’s Smart Invoice system. But the critical question arises:who bears the cost of development?Should it be a single business? A consortium of businesses? Accounting software providers? Or perhaps bookkeeping firms? The burden is heavy, and passing it along to any one entity might not be sustainable.A Common SolutionFrom where I stand, the solution lies in creating a shared integration infrastructure. If an agency or system integrator could act as the backbone — building a standardized layer of communication with Smart Invoice systems — it would drastically reduce redundant efforts across all parties. Businesses, governments, SaaS providers, and bookkeeping firms could collaborate rather than struggle in silos.Such a model would foster harmony in the ecosystem, ensuring compliance while minimizing wasted resources. It’s a vision of unity, efficiency, and shared growth.My ReflectionThis conversation left me reflecting on the broader implications of mandates like these. While they’re driven by good intentions, the execution and the ecosystem-wide impact demand a collaborative approach. If we can bring all stakeholders to the table, we might just turn a daunting mandate into a seamless transition.What’s your take? Could this shared infrastructure vision become a reality?